NathanMuir
Mar 24, 09:58 PM
From the article:
"But states can and must regulate behaviours, including various sexual behaviours," he said.
If I said this against blacks (I am of the opinion that one cannot choose their orientation any more than they can choose their race), would I not be 'persecuting' them according to that definition? What if I further said that being black was an abomination, or that being a 'practicing black' was a sin?
We'd be in a world of **** if what people said could be considered physical acts of persecution.
I suppose when someone says 'persecute' I think of actual acts of persecution. Not words that are protected, in the US at least, by the First Amendment.
Now, if the Church was crucifying these people again, well, that would be a different situation entirely.
I also agree that one cannot choose their sexuality. I've constantly and consistently voiced this opinion on this board.
1. I'm not gay. Just putting that out there. :D
Makes no difference to me.
2. I guess it is hypocritical in a sense: They hate gays for being gay and I hate bigots for being bigoted. Whether or not that puts me on the same level as them is up to you, I guess.
IMO, it does. A hypocritical statement is a hypocritical statement.
Here's another way to word what I think dscuber9000 was trying to say ...
When your beliefs about human nature are based in bigotry, then you will no longer be able to enforce laws based on those beliefs or publicly express your bigoted views without the risk of condemnation.
You are free to keep them in your thoughts and in conversation with like-minded people. However, if aired publicly, you will probably be reminded of the fact that you are a bigot and wrong.
I agree mostly.
I disagree that they are wrong, in their minds of course.
Are they wrong in your mind? Obviously. Are they wrong in my mind? Yes, because I don't agree with their views. Are they wrong in their minds? No, I don't think so if their views are sincerely held.
characters vs. X-men
The mutants of #39;X-men#39; are
Uncanny X-Men 475
Weekend Eye Candy: X Men:
X Men Characters
X-MEN characters are property
X-MEN
X Men Characters
The X-Men are a team of
of the X-Men characters
X-Men Fantastic Four 3.jpg
Wolverine and the X-Men:
X-Men Characters by
as XMen Characters#39;.)
X-Men Evolution
is an X-Men redrawing of
X-Men Legends Picture
Joseph- Unknown Uncanny X-Men
"But states can and must regulate behaviours, including various sexual behaviours," he said.
If I said this against blacks (I am of the opinion that one cannot choose their orientation any more than they can choose their race), would I not be 'persecuting' them according to that definition? What if I further said that being black was an abomination, or that being a 'practicing black' was a sin?
We'd be in a world of **** if what people said could be considered physical acts of persecution.
I suppose when someone says 'persecute' I think of actual acts of persecution. Not words that are protected, in the US at least, by the First Amendment.
Now, if the Church was crucifying these people again, well, that would be a different situation entirely.
I also agree that one cannot choose their sexuality. I've constantly and consistently voiced this opinion on this board.
1. I'm not gay. Just putting that out there. :D
Makes no difference to me.
2. I guess it is hypocritical in a sense: They hate gays for being gay and I hate bigots for being bigoted. Whether or not that puts me on the same level as them is up to you, I guess.
IMO, it does. A hypocritical statement is a hypocritical statement.
Here's another way to word what I think dscuber9000 was trying to say ...
When your beliefs about human nature are based in bigotry, then you will no longer be able to enforce laws based on those beliefs or publicly express your bigoted views without the risk of condemnation.
You are free to keep them in your thoughts and in conversation with like-minded people. However, if aired publicly, you will probably be reminded of the fact that you are a bigot and wrong.
I agree mostly.
I disagree that they are wrong, in their minds of course.
Are they wrong in your mind? Obviously. Are they wrong in my mind? Yes, because I don't agree with their views. Are they wrong in their minds? No, I don't think so if their views are sincerely held.
Gelfin
Mar 24, 07:40 PM
EricNau
Sep 21, 05:00 PM
CaoCao
Mar 24, 08:24 PM
bugfaceuk
Apr 9, 08:23 AM
AidenShaw
Sep 24, 10:45 PM
Evangelion
Mar 20, 12:39 PM
MisterMe
May 2, 08:56 AM
G5isAlive
Mar 18, 07:36 AM
emotion
Sep 21, 09:11 AM
divad1978
Mar 18, 05:10 AM
edifyingGerbil
Apr 27, 09:39 PM
emotion
Sep 20, 10:30 AM
MacQuest
Jul 12, 09:00 AM
roland.g
Sep 20, 09:51 AM
skunk
Mar 26, 01:39 PM
bentmywookie
Mar 18, 03:44 PM
kresh
Sep 20, 06:14 AM
LegendKillerUK
Mar 18, 09:12 AM
edifyingGerbil
Apr 27, 03:04 PM
NewGenAdam
Mar 11, 04:57 PM
*LTD*
Apr 9, 06:48 PM
Denarius
Mar 15, 09:56 PM
Manic Mouse
Jul 13, 06:11 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment